The Nation Builders

Your Voice. Your Values. Your Nation.

The public is finally waking up to understand how 9/11 was the pretext for 2 illegal wars that falsely legalized the murder of 1.5 million civilians.

Peace Activists are increasingly aware that the False Flag of "9/11" was intended as a war on Americans, the Rule of Law and the Constitution. No activist group's plea for PEACE or IMPEACHMENT will be fully effective without including the Truth about 9/11 and a demand that Congress fund a criminal trial to prosecute those guilty of mass murder.

FBI acknowledges evidence for Controlled Demolition presented by Richard Gage, AIA in his VIDEO: 9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH.

On Nov. 7th, 2008 the FBI received a registered letter from Harold Saive, founder of Gators911Truth.org addressed to Director, Robert S. Mueller III. The letter included references to evidence contained in the Richard Gage, AIA video titled: "9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH" in which Gage concludes the analysis of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of three WTC skyscrapers is: "…proof, beyond a reasonable doubt".
WEBSITE: http://AE911TRUTH.org

The letter was submitted pursuant to Title 18 USC § 2382 , "Crimes and Criminal
Procedure", Misprision of Treason. This section applies to officials who have taken an
oath to protect and defend the US Constitution.

Saive expected that USC § 2382 could challenge the FBI to consider the evidence contained in Gage's presentation as "actionable intelligence". The penalty to a sworn official who violates "Misprision of Treason" by not reporting or acting on the evidence can lead to criminal prosecution, a prison term and fine.

On Dec 22, 2008, Saive received a letter of response from the head of FBI's Counterterrorism Div, - Michael J. Heimbach, thanking Saive for "offering to provide information to the United States Government". Heimbach goes on to assess Gage's presentation as "...backed by thorough research and analysis."

In a stunning breakthrough for the 9/11 Truth movement Richard Gage, AIA successfully employed the scientific method to prove the hypothesis of Controlled Demolition of three skyscrapers as "proof, beyond a reasonable doubt" -- with FBI acknowledging Gage's work as: "... backed by thorough research and analysis".

In a conference call with Gators911Truth members, Architect Gage sends Heimbach an open invitation to use the vast resources of AE911Truth and the expertise of over 560 Architects, Engineers and building professionals who all demand a new 9/11 investigation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3uhtkI2gno&feature=channel_page
Saive's letter to the FBI:
http://www.gators911truth.org/PDF/911-letter-HWS-Mueller.PDF
Reply from FBI:
http://www.gators911truth.org/PDF/FBI-Response.pdf

View 2 hr. Video Online: 9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4617650616903609314&hl=en

Stop the Banker Bail-Outs. ...Bail-Out Democracy and the Rule of Law Prosecute 9/11!

Call Congress to fund a criminal trial to prosecute the criminals of mass murder.

Tags: 9/11, Gage, ae911truth, false, flag, inside, job, richard, trason

Views: 1430

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Dude, you are way out there! I'm no conspiracy theorist, but the fact is that no one has explained how building number 5, which was not attacked, fell vertically just like the twin towers. Many persons argue that King George kept America safe after 9/11, but so did Admiral Husband E. Kimmel keep Pearl Harbor safe after December 7, 1941. America in general and the World Trade Center in particular were attacked during the Clinton administration. Both Admiral Kimmel and President Bush received warnings in advance. Condoleeza Rice testified to the Congress that no one could have imagined that airplanes would be used as missiles, even though the military had previously engaged in just such a scenario.

The same doubts can be raised about the Oklahoma City bombings. Early news reports said that the authorities felt very fortunate that they found two unexploded bombs in the building, designed to cut the beams and collapse the building, from which they could find the signatures of the bombers. After about two hours, the news stopped all such revelations.
Dennis,

Thanks for the input. The criminal investigation that was promised never happened. It's time to have a trial now that the FBI is willing to be called a "conspiracy theorist" too.

Building 7 (you said 5). fell at free-fall speed even though nothing hit it. Architect Gage makes his case "beyond a reasonable doubt" using the rigors of the scientific method. The video submitted to the FBI is contained on Architect, Richard Gage's video DVD: 9/11: BLURPRINT FOR TRUTH . The 2 hour multi-media lecture is a compilation of evidence from the past 5 years of research by the Citizen's Investigation Team (CIT) of more than 600 scientists, architects and building professionals. Many publications are published in peer-reviewed journals.

Not too many know the interesting story about the WTC building 7 collapse. Watch this video to hear the words of a demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) in Holland who had never seen WTC 7 collapse until the day of this interview: YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EioEcEgOfqU

Gage offered the FBI (Heimbach) his complete cooperation along with the willing members of his AE911Truth group of 600 professional member base: YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3uhtkI2gno

We have to put pressure on Congress to fund a criminal trial using the overwhelming evidence the FBI says is "backed by thorough research and analysis".. If we can't prosecute the biggest crime in American history, the courts will scarcely be there to protect your civil rights.
Why?...Because they'll think you don't care.....and they'll be right.

HWS
America loves conspiracy theory stories. We lap it up like a great mystery candy bar and we're entertained beyond belief. The internet is loaded with conspiracies of every kind. It probably rivals the porn sites. There are so many theories and people out there debunking events that it seems like we've fallen into Alice's rabbit hole. I, for one, don't know what to believe if everything that's said about 9/11, JFK, MLK or what ever is said with conviction and each contradicts the other.

What should I believe? Are there any political figures or people in public life that you trust?
Jerry,

Your confusion is understandable.

My suggestion is to look at the 2 hour lecture that the FBI say is "backed by thorough research and analysis"

Architect, Richard Gage delivers conclusive evidence that is "...proof beyond a reasonable doubt" , that 3 buildings were destroyed by explosives on 9/11/2001. The 2 aircraft strikes were a horrible spectacle but analysis shows them incapable of creating a free-fall speed collapse of 3 buildings on 9/11. Gage -- a registered Republican -- puts patriotism above party affiliation to put pressure on Congress to fund a criminal trial based on overwhelming evidence analyzed by over 600 architects, engineers, physicists and building professionals.










Jerry Simon said:
America loves conspiracy theory stories. We lap it up like a great mystery candy bar and we're entertained beyond belief. The internet is loaded with conspiracies of every kind. It probably rivals the porn sites. There are so many theories and people out there debunking events that it seems like we've fallen into Alice's rabbit hole. I, for one, don't know what to believe if everything that's said about 9/11, JFK, MLK or what ever is said with conviction and each contradicts the other.
What should I believe? Are there any political figures or people in public life that you trust?
One of the most common ways the "establishment" is able to discourage the public from seeking the truth is by labelling any effort a "conspiracy theory". Most people are quite sensitive to this accusation because no one wants to be fingered as a "nut". This is effective psychologically and allows the "official explaination" to be accepted. By rejecting "conspiracy theories" we are saying that conspiracies never occur in real life. Despite this ludicris suggestion, in real life, they happen all the time. Witness how many people are already in jail for one reason or another where the primary charge is conspiracy. A conspiracy is just an event coordinated by more than one person, after all. Why is the American public so easily persuaded? I don't have the answer for this, but obviously the current method works.
How is it then that the lies, ie. conspiracy, about the war in Iraq being waged for oil and not WMD or democracy wasn't better covered up? Or the outing of a CIA agent exposed so easily without elaborate conspiratorial cover-ups. Many more died in the Iraq conspiracy but few would dispute that the attempt to hid the truth failed even though the real culprits have not been brought to justice yet. No weapons of mass destruction were found and there were leaks galore about the governments deceptions. Where are the leaks, from on high, regarding the deceptions on 9/11? Why is the majority of the American public aware of the lies in that instance and relatively few aware of anything other then the popular explanations of 9/11?

If what you say is true, and the powers that be so clever, we haven't a chance. Don't you think?
Well, whatever the building number (I assume you are correct as 7), it fell vertically. I also recall an interview with the owner of the building who said they had to pull it, which means drop it with demolitions. Squibs are clearly visible on all buildings. Also, firemen at the scene in early interviews said they heard sequential explosions, "boom, boom, boom." Survivors of the Twin Towers also said they heard a succession of explosions that shook the building just before the airplanes hit. One video of one of the aircraft show an airplane hitting a tower with no side windows and an auxiliary section running along the side, very much like a military airplane.

The unfortunate fact is that we'll never get to the bottom of this event. I recall reading an excellent book, The Autobiography of Lincoln Steffens, one of the foremost and first investigative journalists. Teddy Roosevelt asked, "Why is this guy always raking up the muck?" from which the term "muckraker" was coined. Steffens's journalism was often discounted because he was an admitted Communist, back when the Socialist Party and the Communist Party were perfectly legal in this country. (BTW he writes so eloquently that one chapter about his childhood was lifted and printed as a children's story.) Anyway, back in the 1930's there had been a series of scandals in a big city like Chicago. Steffens interviewed one of the Captains of Industry, as they were then known, and asked him how he thought he would get away with five scandals in as many weeks. The executive laughed and said they figured they needed at least three. Steffens was astonished and asked why. The exec explained that with one scandal the public becomes indignant and demands an investigation. With two, the public is divided, with three they are fractured, and so on until no strong movement can focus on any single problem. When you recall all the scandals in this country that occur one after another, you will no doubt remember some that seem to never have been resolved--we just go on to the next one.

As I said in another posting, the assassination of JFK hasn't been solved yet. Books have been written about it, but one fact I clearly recall because the witness was in US Army Special Forces, as I was, and my father before me. He had been approached by black ops and asked whether or not he had any problems with a domestic assassination. He said he absolutely did. Foreign assassinations were okay (my father conducted such clandestine missions), but not domestic. So, they found another guy to do the job. Later on, the government claimed the guy they picked never existed. The old former Green Beret countered that he went to training with that guy at the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, and he produced a class roster with the guy's name on it, and their subsequent orders.

We'll never get to the bottom of these things. Just when you get close to the truth in one situation, a bomb goes off somewhere, or right-wing death squads operate in South America with American assistance, or the economy goes tits up, etc.
To the contrary, Dennis...there are many whistleblowers who've stepped forward -- and many more to come. Problem is....if the media doesn't cover it....they don't exist. When we learn where to trust information published on the web, we realize to what extent we've been betrayed by what was once the reliable "fourth estate" of journalism.

Stop to think just how much we depend on (trust) the mainstream media to keep us informed. So much so that anything that doesn't make it to your 42 inch plasma screen is too often dismissed as the work of "conspiracy theorists" and crack-pots.

But remember....the Revolutionary War planned by a whole group of conspiracy theorists.


Dennis St. John said:
Well, whatever the building number (I assume you are correct as 7), it fell vertically. I also recall an interview with the owner of the building who said they had to pull it, which means drop it with demolitions. Squibs are clearly visible on all buildings. Also, firemen at the scene in early interviews said they heard sequential explosions, "boom, boom, boom." Survivors of the Twin Towers also said they heard a succession of explosions that shook the building just before the airplanes hit. One video of one of the aircraft show an airplane hitting a tower with no side windows and an auxiliary section running along the side, very much like a military airplane.

The unfortunate fact is that we'll never get to the bottom of this event. I recall reading an excellent book, The Autobiography of Lincoln Steffens, one of the foremost and first investigative journalists. Teddy Roosevelt asked, "Why is this guy always raking up the muck?" from which the term "muckraker" was coined. Steffens's journalism was often discounted because he was an admitted Communist, back when the Socialist Party and the Communist Party were perfectly legal in this country. (BTW he writes so eloquently that one chapter about his childhood was lifted and printed as a children's story.) Anyway, back in the 1930's there had been a series of scandals in a big city like Chicago. Steffens interviewed one of the Captains of Industry, as they were then known, and asked him how he thought he would get away with five scandals in as many weeks. The executive laughed and said they figured they needed at least three. Steffens was astonished and asked why. The exec explained that with one scandal the public becomes indignant and demands an investigation. With two, the public is divided, with three they are fractured, and so on until no strong movement can focus on any single problem. When you recall all the scandals in this country that occur one after another, you will no doubt remember some that seem to never have been resolved--we just go on to the next one.

As I said in another posting, the assassination of JFK hasn't been solved yet. Books have been written about it, but one fact I clearly recall because the witness was in US Army Special Forces, as I was, and my father before me. He had been approached by black ops and asked whether or not he had any problems with a domestic assassination. He said he absolutely did. Foreign assassinations were okay (my father conducted such clandestine missions), but not domestic. So, they found another guy to do the job. Later on, the government claimed the guy they picked never existed. The old former Green Beret countered that he went to training with that guy at the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, and he produced a class roster with the guy's name on it, and their subsequent orders.

We'll never get to the bottom of these things. Just when you get close to the truth in one situation, a bomb goes off somewhere, or right-wing death squads operate in South America with American assistance, or the economy goes tits up, etc.
Can you keep a conspiracy a secret? It depends on how many people know the secret to begin with or are either directly or indirectly exposed to it. Think about this: there are thousands of employees working at the NSA but only one of them leaked the information about the surveilance program during the Bush Administration to the New York Times. People keep secrets when they have the personal motivation or incentive or authorative pressure to do so. Fortunately, most people are blabber mouths and like to express themselves and their "insider knowledge." Many crimes are solved by the police because the criminal gets drunk or talks about his crime, whatever his/her reason. Generally, I would tend to believe that most conspiracies fall apart and become known eventually. But I also think it is too easy to dismiss the possibility as well. Many goals in life after all need more than one person to accomplish them. Why should we exclude the possibility that there might be more than one person who feels the need to do something they think is good but others would label awful or evil?
Jerry,

Watch the video and tell me why you think the FBI said the evidence is "backed by thorough research and analysis."

HWS






Jerry Simon said:
How is it then that the lies, ie. conspiracy, about the war in Iraq being waged for oil and not WMD or democracy wasn't better covered up? Or the outing of a CIA agent exposed so easily without elaborate conspiratorial cover-ups. Many more died in the Iraq conspiracy but few would dispute that the attempt to hid the truth failed even though the real culprits have not been brought to justice yet. No weapons of mass destruction were found and there were leaks galore about the governments deceptions. Where are the leaks, from on high, regarding the deceptions on 9/11? Why is the majority of the American public aware of the lies in that instance and relatively few aware of anything other then the popular explanations of 9/11?
If what you say is true, and the powers that be so clever, we haven't a chance. Don't you think?
Erik,

There are many who have stepped forward to talk about the 9/11 False Flag. But we have a National Media that has been complicit in the actually protecting the government cover-up of 9/11.

One historical analog is the development of the atomic bomb...ironically known as THE MANHATTAN PROJECT. Over 130,000 workers at over a dozen sites kept the secret of the atomic bomb. Keeping secrets was not that difficult since almost none of the workers had any idea they were manufacturing a nuclear bomb.

Read the article: http://gators911truth.org/PDF/MANHATTAN-PROJECTS.pdf




Erik Strand said:
Can you keep a conspiracy a secret? It depends on how many people know the secret to begin with or are either directly or indirectly exposed to it. Think about this: there are thousands of employees working at the NSA but only one of them leaked the information about the surveilance program during the Bush Administration to the New York Times. People keep secrets when they have the personal motivation or incentive or authorative pressure to do so. Fortunately, most people are blabber mouths and like to express themselves and their "insider knowledge." Many crimes are solved by the police because the criminal gets drunk or talks about his crime, whatever his/her reason. Generally, I would tend to believe that most conspiracies fall apart and become known eventually. But I also think it is too easy to dismiss the possibility as well. Many goals in life after all need more than one person to accomplish them. Why should we exclude the possibility that there might be more than one person who feels the need to do something they think is good but others would label awful or evil?
There is a group called CIT (Citizens Investigation Team) who proved via on location witness interviews at the Citgo Gas station and Arlington Cemetary workers,and maintenance people,two Pentagon cops,a ATC for the helipad area of the Pentagon,and many more...who undoubtably saw a large plane take a northside path to the Pentagon and did a flyover.
Pilotsfor911truth.org (over 200 members) sued via the FOIA act to receive the FDR (Date recorder) for the alleged Flight 77 plane it also showed a Northside path...all of this contradicting the offical gov't/commission South path.
The alleged hijackers were living in various places, most notably in Florida, side by side with Israeli spies leading up to 9/11. 5 "dancing" Israeli's were arrested on 9/11 for video taping the first plane to hit the WTC, proving foreknowledge on their part.They were soon proven to be Israeli Mossad agents. Meanwhile,other Mossad were arrested for suspicion of a conspiracy to blow up the GW Bridge in NYC. There van was found with bombs,box cutters,etc. They were found out to be Mossad agents. The U.S. military's Intel program called "Able Danger" had Atta and the hijackers pegged and followed via data mining intel, but ordered to destroy all data and to shut down the operation. FBI agents , who were close to solving isolated Al Qaeda ops, sucn as John O'Neil being red hot on OBL for the USS Cole case --- had his VISA suspended by U.S. Ambassador to Yemen, Barbara Bodine so he was not able to re-enter Yemen to complete the case.
Many CIA and FBI agents had cases shut down when hot on the trail of hjackers. Why?? The NSA admitted that they had everyone in America under all kinds of surveillence, yet they had 4 9/11 hijackers living next to them in Langely, Va....yet they had no idea? Yeah,right! The WTC's had unsolveable Asbestos problems, yet businessman Larry Silverstein risked millions of his own dollars in a big trouble big risk real estate investment just weeks before 9/11 and after the Port Authority owned them for 30 years? He insures it for terrorist attacks and later collects $10 billion dollars.
Alleged hijackers, including Atta, had connections to the Venice,Florida flight school which was owned by Dutch Nationalists who were proved to be drug smugglers (Rudy Dekker the most notorious) who had connections to fraudalent Lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who owned Sun Cruz Casino ships, who's owner Gus Boulis sold partnership to Abramoff on and IOU credit...but Boulis was gunned down in Ft.Lauderdale. Yet, Abramoff escaped without charges. Atta and some hijackers were seen by over 100 witnesses on the ship partying. Atta was seen flasing a gold watch and wearing expensive clothes around Venice,Hollywood,Fl..and Miami and courting Hookers (as was other hijackers). Seems to me these guys don't fit the devout Koran loving suicide types to me. Atta> Dekkers> Abramhoff > and on and on!!

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Pitch In!



Make gift to today to keep The Nation strong.

Members

© 2014   Created by Peggy Randall.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service